Invitations sent by Indian President Droupadi Murmu for a dinner on the sidelines of the G20 summit have ignited a debate over the country’s name, leading to speculation that the government may be considering a change.
Traditionally, invitations issued by Indian constitutional bodies have followed a linguistic convention, mentioning “India” in English and “Bharat” in Hindi. However, these G20 dinner invitations, which were in English, referred to President Murmu as the “President of Bharat.”
This linguistic deviation from the norm has raised eyebrows and prompted questions about whether there might be a shift in the official nomenclature of the country. The use of “Bharat” in English text for an international event has led some to wonder if it signifies a deliberate departure from the long-standing practice of referring to the nation as India on the global stage.
When approached for a statement on the matter, an official at the president’s office declined to comment, adding further mystery to the situation. As speculation continues to swirl, observers and citizens alike are keen to know whether this unconventional choice of wording signifies a potential change in India’s official name or if it was merely an isolated incident.
